in the Matter of the Marriage of Jill Megan McKay and Malcolm Franklin McKay and in the Interest of E. R. M., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2012
Docket07-11-00464-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of the Marriage of Jill Megan McKay and Malcolm Franklin McKay and in the Interest of E. R. M., a Child (in the Matter of the Marriage of Jill Megan McKay and Malcolm Franklin McKay and in the Interest of E. R. M., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of the Marriage of Jill Megan McKay and Malcolm Franklin McKay and in the Interest of E. R. M., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0435-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 7, 2012 ______________________________

NICOLE HICKS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees ______________________________

FROM THE 364th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2011-429,920; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING _______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Nicole Hicks appeals from her conviction for the offense of theft of over

$20,000 but less than $100,000. On November 2, 2012, the clerk’s record was filed.

The reporter’s record was due on November 5, 2012. On November 5, 2012, the

reporter filed a request for an extension of time to file the record for the reasons that

appellant has not submitted a request for preparation and a written designation for the

record, nor has she paid for the record. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the causes to the 364th District

Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial

court shall determine, via hearing or other reasonable means:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free record or appointed counsel.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters

(including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to

represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be

filed with this court by December 7, 2012. Should further time be needed to perform

these tasks, then same must be requested before December 7, 2012.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of the Marriage of Jill Megan McKay and Malcolm Franklin McKay and in the Interest of E. R. M., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-jill-megan-mckay--texapp-2012.