In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and in the Interest of M.E.J., a Child v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 2025
Docket10-25-00170-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and in the Interest of M.E.J., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and in the Interest of M.E.J., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and in the Interest of M.E.J., a Child v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas

10-25-00170-CV

In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and In the Interest of M.E.J., a Child

On appeal from the County Court at Law of Navarro County, Texas Judge Amanda Doan Putman, presiding Trial Court Cause No. C21-30154-CV

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed an appeal from an oral ruling dismissing a guardian ad

litem and extending temporary orders in a proceeding under the Family Code.

By letter dated June 10, 2025, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that

the appeal is subject to dismissal because there is no final, appealable order

and that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 14 days, a response was

filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. A response was filed on June

11, 2025, but it does not show any ground to continue the appeal. Temporary orders in proceedings relating to a child under the Family

Code are not appealable. See TEX. FAM. CODE §105.001(e); see also Little v.

Daggett, 858 S.W.2d 368, 369 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a).

MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice

OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: June 18, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeal dismissed CV06

In the Matter of the Marriage of Jackson Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Little v. Daggett
858 S.W.2d 368 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamika Jackson and Akli Bakari Jackson and in the Interest of M.E.J., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-jamika-jackson-and-akli-bakari-jackson-and-texapp-2025.