in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez

DecidedMarch 25, 2004

Docket13-03-00148-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez (in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-03-148-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF GIANCARLO MARTINEZ

AND CYNTHIA JEAN MARTINEZ

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Kleberg County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, GIANCARLO MARTINEZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 01-398-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On February 23, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 25th day of March, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-03-148-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF GIANCARLO MARTINEZ

AND CYNTHIA JEAN MARTINEZ

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Kleberg County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, GIANCARLO MARTINEZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 01-398-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On February 23, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 25th day of March, 2004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Matter of the Marriage of Giancarlo Martinez and Cynthia Jean v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-giancarlo-martine-texapp-2004.