in the Matter of the Marriage of Deborah L. Goynes and Gary Charles Goynes and in the Interest of Garrett C. Goynes, a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2006
Docket06-06-00012-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of the Marriage of Deborah L. Goynes and Gary Charles Goynes and in the Interest of Garrett C. Goynes, a Child (in the Matter of the Marriage of Deborah L. Goynes and Gary Charles Goynes and in the Interest of Garrett C. Goynes, a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of the Marriage of Deborah L. Goynes and Gary Charles Goynes and in the Interest of Garrett C. Goynes, a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-06-00012-CV



 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

DEBORAH L. GOYNES AND GARY CHARLES GOYNES

AND IN THE INTEREST OF GARRETT C. GOYNES, A CHILD



                                              


On Appeal from the 76th Judicial District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. 31785



                                                 



Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Gary Charles Goynes has filed pro se an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed December 7, 2005. The clerk's record was filed in this Court February 21, 2006, and the reporter's record was filed April 5, 2006. Goynes' brief was, therefore, due May 5, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6.

            On May 23, 2006, we contacted Goynes by letter, reminding him that his brief was overdue and that we had not received a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief. We also warned Goynes that, if we did not receive his brief within fifteen days of the date of the letter, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) and (c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

            As of the date of this opinion, we have received no response.

            We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss

                                                                                    Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          June 26, 2006

Date Decided:             June 27, 2006

Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>

In The

  Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-11-00103-CV

                                                ______________________________

                                                                 

                       IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF GEORGE P. PIPES

                                                                 

                                                                                                  

                                            On Appeal from the County Court at Law

                                                             Bowie County, Texas

                                                     Trial Court No. 10C0603-CCL

                                                                                                   

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

            George P. Pipes, appellant, filed a motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal on October 7, 2011, which was granted.  No notice of appeal has been filed.

            On November 30, 2011, we contacted Pipes by letter, giving him an opportunity to cure this defect, and warning him that if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

            We have received no communication from Pipes.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

                                                                                    Bailey C. Moseley

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of the Marriage of Deborah L. Goynes and Gary Charles Goynes and in the Interest of Garrett C. Goynes, a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-marriage-of-deborah-l-goynes-and-gary-charles-goynes-texapp-2006.