in the Matter of the Marriage of Clinton Bowers and Barbara Bowers
Opinions
OPINION
This is- an' appeal from a judgment signed December 12, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed February 9,. 2016.. The reporter’s record was filed February 10, 2015. Appellant filed a brief that failed to substantially comply with Rule 38 of. the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R.,App. P. 38.1(a), (c), (f), and (i). On September 1, 2015, appellant was ordered to file an amended .¡brief within thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9 and 42.3(b).
On September 29, 2015, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file [458]*458his amended brief. The motion fails to state the length of the extension sought or any facts relied upon to explain- the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B) and (C). Accordingly, appellants motion is denied and the appeal is ordered dismissed. .
(McCally, J., dissenting)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
479 S.W.3d 457 (in the Matter of the Marriage of Clinton Bowers and Barbara Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.