in the Matter of the Marriage of Bonnie B. Doyle and Bennie Wayne Doyle
Opinion
NO. 12-19-00331-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
IN THE MATTER OF THE § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND
MARRIAGE OF BONNIE B. DOYLE § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
AND BENNIE WAYNE DOYLE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This accelerated appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(b). Bonnie Broussard Doyle filed a notice of appeal from an order appointing a receiver. The clerk’s record was filed on December 13, 2019 and the reporter’s record was filed on January 13, 2020. 2 Bonnie’s brief was due on or before February 3, 2020. On February 5, this Court notified Bonnie that the brief was past due. We further notified Bonnie that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a motion for extension of time, containing a reasonable explanation for the failure to file a brief and showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby, is filed no later than February 18. That deadline expired without a motion for extension of time or other response from Bonnie.
When an appellant fails to timely file a brief, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). Because Bonnie failed to (1) either file a timely brief or file a late brief accompanied by a motion
1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(1) (West Supp. 2019); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 28.1(a).
2 On November 13, 2019, this Court dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. See In the Matter of the Marriage of Doyle, No. 12-19-00331-CV, 2019 WL 5956673 (Tex. App.— Tyler Nov. 13, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.). Bonnie subsequently paid the filing fee in accordance with Rule 5; we granted her motion for rehearing and reinstated the appeal.
for leave to file late brief or (2) file a motion for extension of time along with the required filing fee, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Opinion delivered February 28, 2020. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
FEBRUARY 28, 2020
NO. 12-19-00331-CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF BONNIE B. DOYLE AND BENNIE WAYNE DOYLE
Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM17-0152-392)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Matter of the Marriage of Bonnie B. Doyle and Bennie Wayne Doyle (in the Matter of the Marriage of Bonnie B. Doyle and Bennie Wayne Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.