in the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 5, 2019·No. 01-19-00722-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock

Appellate case number: 01-19-00722-CV

Trial court case number: 15-FD-3019

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

In this direct appeal of a final divorce decree, appellant, Mindy Lee Comstock, has filed a motion for temporary relief and stay. Appellant asks this Court to stay enforcement and contempt proceedings in the trial court. Appellee, Allan Ray Comstock, has filed a response to appellant’s motion. When a final judgment has not been superseded or stayed pending an appeal, the trial court may entertain a motion for contempt. In re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114, 124–25 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); see also In re Crow-Billingsley Air Park, Ltd., 98 S.W.3d 178, 179 (Tex. 2003) (orig. proceeding) (holding trial court had jurisdiction to hear motion to enforce final judgment even though judgment appealed); TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.709(j), 9.002, 9.007(a). The final divorce decree in this appeal has not been superseded or stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1, 24.2. Accordingly, the Court denies appellant’s motion. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 5, 2019___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock (in the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sheshtawy
154 S.W.3d 114 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Crow-Billingsley Air Park, Ltd.
98 S.W.3d 178 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)