In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the Chase Manhattan Bank

New York Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the Chase Manhattan Bank

7 N.Y.3d 824

DecidedSeptember 12, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.3d 824 (In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the Chase Manhattan Bank, 7 N.Y.3d 824 (N.Y. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

7 N.Y.3d 824 (2006)

In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the CHASE MANHATTAN BANK (Successor in Interest to CHASE LINCOLN FIRST BANK, N.A., Successor in Interest to LINCOLN FIRST BANK OF ROCHESTER, Formerly Known as LINCOLN ROCHESTER TRUST COMPANY), as Trustee of the Trust for the Benefit of BLANCHE D. HUNTER, Deceased, and Another, under "Fifth" of the Will of CHARLES G. DUMONT, Deceased, Respondent.
MARGARET HUNTER et al., Appellants-Respondents;
ELIOT SPITZER, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Submitted June 5, 2006. Decided September 12, 2006.

Motion by appellants Margaret Hunter et al. for leave to appeal denied. Motion by the Attorney General for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

7 N.Y.3d 824 (2006)

In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Second Intermediate Account of the CHASE MANHATTAN BANK (Successor in Interest to CHASE LINCOLN FIRST BANK, N.A., Successor in Interest to LINCOLN FIRST BANK OF ROCHESTER, Formerly Known as LINCOLN ROCHESTER TRUST COMPANY), as Trustee of the Trust for the Benefit of BLANCHE D. HUNTER, Deceased, and Another, under "Fifth" of the Will of CHARLES G. DUMONT, Deceased, Respondent.
MARGARET HUNTER et al., Appellants-Respondents;
ELIOT SPITZER, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Submitted June 5, 2006. Decided September 12, 2006.

Motion by appellants Margaret Hunter et al. for leave to appeal denied. Motion by the Attorney General for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.Y.3d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-se-ny-2006.