in the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft. Read the opinion of the Court — 560 S.W.3d 379
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 5, 2015·No. 14-15-00911-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 14-15-00911-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS Appellate Docket Number: 14-15-00911-CV HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/5/2015 10:35:18 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE Appellate Case Style: In the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft CLERK

Vs.

Companion Case No.: FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/5/2015 10:35:18 AM Amended/corrected statement: DOCKETING STATEMENT (Civil) CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk Appellate Court:14th Court of Appeals (to be filed in the court of appeals upon perfection of appeal under TRAP 32)

I. Appellant II. Appellant Attorney(s) Person Organization (choose one) Lead Attorney First Name: Jerry First Name: Mark Middle Name: W. Middle Name: Scott Last Name: Simoneaux Last Name: Croft Suffix: Jr. Suffix: Law Firm Name: Simoneaux & Watson

Pro Se: Address 1: 12 Greenway Plz Ste 1100 Address 2: City: Houston State: Texas Zip+4: 77046 Telephone: 713-999-9577 ext. Fax: 281-369-5775 Email: js@sandwlawfirm.com SBN: 24033192

III. Appellee IV. Appellee Attorney(s) Person Organization (choose one) Lead Attorney First Name: N/A First Name: N/A - Uncontested Matter Middle Name: Middle Name: Last Name: Last Name: Suffix: Suffix: Law Firm Name: Pro Se: Address 1: Address 2: City: State: Texas Zip+4: Telephone: ext. Fax: Email: SBN: Page 1 of 7 V. Perfection Of Appeal And Jurisdiction

Nature of Case (Subject matter or type of case): Guardianship

Date order or judgment signed: October 13, 2015 Type of judgment: Bench Trial Date notice of appeal filed in trial court: October 20, 2015 If mailed to the trial court clerk, also give the date mailed: Interlocutory appeal of appealable order: Yes No If yes, please specify statutory or other basis on which interlocutory order is appealable (See TRAP 28):

Accelerated appeal (See TRAP 28): Yes No If yes, please specify statutory or other basis on which appeal is accelerated:

Parental Termination or Child Protection? (See TRAP 28.4): Yes ■ No

Permissive? (See TRAP 28.3): Yes No If yes, please specify statutory or other basis for such status:

Agreed? (See TRAP 28.2): Yes No If yes, please specify statutory or other basis for such status:

Appeal should receive precedence, preference, or priority under statute or rule: Yes No If yes, please specify statutory or other basis for such status:

Does this case involve an amount under $100,000? Yes No Judgment or order disposes of all parties and issues: Yes No Appeal from final judgment: Yes No Does the appeal involve the constitutionality or the validity of a statute, rule, or ordinance? Yes No

VI. Actions Extending Time To Perfect Appeal

Motion for New Trial: Yes No If yes, date filed: Motion to Modify Judgment: Yes No If yes, date filed: Request for Findings of Fact Yes No If yes, date filed: October 20, 2015 and Conclusions of Law: Yes No If yes, date filed: Motion to Reinstate: Yes No If yes, date filed: Motion under TRCP 306a: Other: Yes No If other, please specify: Appeal from an uncontested matter. No Appellee

VII. Indigency Of Party: (Attach file-stamped copy of affidavit, and extension motion if filed.)

Affidavit filed in trial court: Yes No If yes, date filed:

Contest filed in trial court: Yes No If yes, date filed:

Date ruling on contest due:

Ruling on contest: Sustained Overruled Date of ruling:

Page 2 of 7 VIII. Bankruptcy

Has any party to the court's judgment filed for protection in bankruptcy which might affect this appeal? Yes No If yes, please attach a copy of the petition.

Date bankruptcy filed: Bankruptcy Case Number:

IX. Trial Court And Record

Court: Harris County Probate Court No. 3 Clerk's Record: County: Harris County Trial Court Clerk: District County Trial Court Docket Number (Cause No.): 415,844 Was clerk's record requested? Yes No If yes, date requested: October 20, 2015 Trial Judge (who tried or disposed of case): If no, date it will be requested: First Name: Rory Were payment arrangements made with clerk? Middle Name: Robert Yes No Indigent Last Name: Olsen (Note: No request required under TRAP 34.5(a),(b)) Suffix: Address 1: 201 Caroline St 7th Floor Address 2 : City: Houston State: Texas Zip + 4: 77002 Telephone: 713-368-6730 ext. Fax: 713-368-7166 Email:

Reporter's or Recorder's Record:

Is there a reporter's record? Yes No Was reporter's record requested? Yes No

Was there a reporter's record electronically recorded? Yes No If yes, date requested: October 20, 2015

If no, date it will be requested: Were payment arrangements made with the court reporter/court recorder? Yes No Indigent

Page 3 of 7 Court Reporter Court Recorder Official Substitute

First Name: Robin Middle Name: Kulhanek Last Name: Day Suffix: Address 1: 201 Caroline St 7th Floor Address 2: City: Houston State: Texas Zip + 4: 77002 Telephone: 713-368-6730 ext. Fax: 713-368-7166 Email: Robin.Kulhanek@prob.hctx.net

X. Supersedeas Bond Supersedeas bond filed: Yes No If yes, date filed:

Will file: Yes No

XI. Extraordinary Relief

Will you request extraordinary relief (e.g. temporary or ancillary relief) from this Court? Yes No If yes, briefly state the basis for your request:

XII. Alternative Dispute Resolution/Mediation (Complete section if filing in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, or 14th Court of Appeal) Should this appeal be referred to mediation? Yes No

If no, please specify:Uncontested matter. There is no opposing party. Has the case been through an ADR procedure? Yes No If yes, who was the mediator? What type of ADR procedure? At what stage did the case go through ADR? Pre-Trial Post-Trial Other

If other, please specify:

Type of case? Guardianship Give a brief description of the issue to be raised on appeal, the relief sought, and the applicable standard for review, if known (without prejudice to the right to raise additional issues or request additional relief): Preponderance of the evidence in an uncontested matter supported Restoration of the Ward. Erroneous application of law. Reverse the judgment . SOR: Sufficiency of the Evidence, Error

How was the case disposed of? Trial Summary of relief granted, including amount of money judgment, and if any, damages awarded. Seeking to reverse judgment denying restoration of the Ward. If money judgment, what was the amount? Actual damages: Punitive (or similar) damages:

Page 4 of 7 Attorney's fees (trial): Attorney's fees (appellate): Other: If other, please specify:

Will you challenge this Court's jurisdiction? Yes No Does judgment have language that one or more parties "take nothing"? Yes No Does judgment have a Mother Hubbard clause? Yes No Other basis for finality? Texas Estates Code § 32.001(c) Rate the complexity of the case (use 1 for least and 5 for most complex): 1 2 3 4 5 Please make my answer to the preceding questions known to other parties in this case. Yes No Can the parties agree on an appellate mediator? Yes No If yes, please give name, address, telephone, fax and email address: Name Address Telephone Fax Email

Languages other than English in which the mediator should be proficient: Name of person filing out mediation section of docketing statement:

XIII. Related Matters List any pending or past related appeals before this or any other Texas appellate court by court, docket number, and style.

Docket Number: Trial Court:

Style:

Page 5 of 7 XIV.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft (in the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Scott Croft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 32.001
Texas ES § 32.001(c)