In the Matter of the Estate of Ronald Franklin Warren v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Matter of the Estate of Ronald Franklin Warren v. the State of Texas (In the Matter of the Estate of Ronald Franklin Warren v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-25-00002-CV § IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE Appeal from the OF RONALD FRANKLIN WARREN, § 83rd District Court DECEASED. § of Pecos County, Texas § (TC# P-8696-83-CV) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Karen Ashley Courtney-Warren, filed a notice of appeal in the above-styled and
numbered cause with this Court.
When the appeal was docketed in this court on January 2, 2025, the Clerk of this Court
notified Appellant that it appeared that there was no appealable order or judgment. We requested
Appellant to show grounds for continuing the appeal or this Court would dismiss for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(2) (providing that a notice of appeal “[must] state the date
of the judgment or order appealed from”). Appellant timely responded to our notice but did not
identify the date of the judgment or order and otherwise failed to establish this Court’s jurisdiction. We have since received two documents from the District Clerk of Pecos County, Texas. From our
review of the records, we determined Appellant’s notice of appeal was late but filed within 15 days
of the deadline for the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. On January 31, 2025, we issued an
order requesting Appellant to file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal that
meets the requirements of Rule 10.5(b)(2) by February 21, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2),
26.3.
As of this date, we have not received a motion for extension of time to file the notice of
appeal, nor have we received any type of response from Appellant. Additionally, we received a
letter from the district clerk informing this Court that Appellant has not paid, nor arranged to pay,
for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). Lastly, Appellant has
failed to file a docketing statement after two requests from this Court.
Because Appellant has failed to file the requested motion, make arrangements for the
clerk’s record, file a docketing statement, or otherwise comply with this Court’s directives, we
dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice
March 10, 2025
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of the Estate of Ronald Franklin Warren v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-estate-of-ronald-franklin-warren-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.