in the Matter of the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen
This text of in the Matter of the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen (in the Matter of the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-99-556-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CLYNE EDWARD MEINEN, DECEASED ___________________________________________________________
On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas. _____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 1 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Lee Meinen, and appellee, Jean Corbin, the administrator/executrix of
the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. See
1 This appeal was originally subm itted to a panel consisting of Justice Federico G. Hinojosa, whose term of office expired on Decem ber 31, 2006, Justice Nelda V. Rodriguez, and Senior Justice John Hill, assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Suprem e Court of Texas. See T EX . G O V 'T C OD E A N N . § 74.003 (Vernon 2005). The m atter is now being subm itted to the current panel in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 41.1(a),(c). TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). According to the motion, the parties “have fully and finally
compromised and settled” all matters in controversy between them.
This Court previously issued an opinion and judgment in this cause on March 1,
2001. The appeal remained pending in this Court, however, based on motions for
rehearing and a motion to stay all proceedings on appeal pending settlement.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the joint
motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we
withdraw the opinion and judgment of March 1, 2001, and substitute this opinion and
judgment in their place. See id. 42.1(c).
The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED. See id.
42.1(a)(1), 43.2(e). All other pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Costs are
assessed against appellant. Id. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 6th day of March, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-estate-of-clyne-edward-meinen-texapp-2008.