In the Matter of the Complaint of Robert Anglin, as the Owner of a 2005 Chaparral 230 SSi HIN FGBS2785I405, for Exoneration or Limitation of Liability
This text of In the Matter of the Complaint of Robert Anglin, as the Owner of a 2005 Chaparral 230 SSi HIN FGBS2785I405, for Exoneration or Limitation of Liability (In the Matter of the Complaint of Robert Anglin, as the Owner of a 2005 Chaparral 230 SSi HIN FGBS2785I405, for Exoneration or Limitation of Liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF ROBERT ANGLIN, as the owner of a 2005 Chaparral Case No. 8:25-cv-1132-TPB-CPT 230 SSi HIN FGBS2785I405, for exoneration or limitation of liability,
Petitioner. ____________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Christopher P. Tuite, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on October 17, 2025. (Doc. 44). Judge Tuite recommends that the “Limitation Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Default Judgment” (Doc. 41) be granted. No party has objected, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Tuite’s well- reasoned report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 44) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) “Limitation Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Default Judgment” (Doc. 41)is GRANTED, as set forth in the report and recommendation. (3) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment for exoneration by default in Anglin’s favor and against all persons and/or entities that have failed to file claims in this action. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 2nd day of December, 2025.
TOMBARBER =———(‘“‘C;;*~*~™ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of the Complaint of Robert Anglin, as the Owner of a 2005 Chaparral 230 SSi HIN FGBS2785I405, for Exoneration or Limitation of Liability, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-the-complaint-of-robert-anglin-as-the-owner-of-a-2005-flmd-2025.