In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Glenn David Jones

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided January 13, 2016·No. 2016-UP-004·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Glenn David Jones, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001744

Appeal From Charleston County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-004 Submitted November 1, 2015 – Filed January 13, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of Law Office of Charles T. Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.2

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Glenn David Jones, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Glenn David Jones (In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Glenn David Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy
602 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)