In the Matter of the Brinkman
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, Robert Brinkman, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator (“SVP”), pursuant to sections 632.480 et seq. RSMo (2000). No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
314 S.W.3d 393 (In the Matter of the Brinkman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.