In THE MATTER OF STROMAN v. Corning

New York Court of Appeals

In THE MATTER OF STROMAN v. Corning

8 N.Y.3d 908

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

8 N.Y.3d 908 (2007)

In the Matter of STEVE STROMAN, Appellant,
v.
PETER E. CORNING, as a County Court Justice, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted February 5, 2007. Decided March 27, 2007.

Judge PIGOTT taking no part.

*909 On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 N.Y.3d 908 (2007)

In the Matter of STEVE STROMAN, Appellant,
v.
PETER E. CORNING, as a County Court Justice, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted February 5, 2007. Decided March 27, 2007.

Judge PIGOTT taking no part.

*909 On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

In THE MATTER OF STROMAN v. Corning, 8 N.Y.3d 908 (N.Y. 2007).

Pincite

8 N.Y.3d 908 (In THE MATTER OF STROMAN v. Corning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

In the Matter of STEVE STROMAN, Appellant, v. PETER E. CORNING, as a County Court Justice, Respondent.

Related

In the Matter of STEVE STROMAN, Appellant,
v.
PETER E. CORNING, as a County Court Justice, Respondent.