In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson

Fifth Circuit

In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson

376 F.2d 196, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6648

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1967·No. 23667_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the inadequacy of the fee awarded him by the Referee for services rendered as counsel for the bankrupt. Such inequity as is disclosed by the record, based on a comparison of services rendered by appellant and counsel for the receiver-trustee and their respective fees, does not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion. See Blanch v. Rankin, 5 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 217.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the inadequacy of the fee awarded him by the Referee for services rendered as counsel for the bankrupt. Such inequity as is disclosed by the record, based on a comparison of services rendered by appellant and counsel for the receiver-trustee and their respective fees, does not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion. See Blanch v. Rankin, 5 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 217.

Affirmed.

In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson, 376 F.2d 196, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6648 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

376 F.2d 196 (In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related