In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson

Fifth Circuit

In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson

376 F.2d 196, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6648

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 1967

Docket23667_1

StatusPublished

This text of 376 F.2d 196 (In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Rudolph N. Patterson, 376 F.2d 196, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6648 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the inadequacy of the fee awarded him by the Referee for services rendered as counsel for the bankrupt. Such inequity as is disclosed by the record, based on a comparison of services rendered by appellant and counsel for the receiver-trustee and their respective fees, does not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion. See Blanch v. Rankin, 5 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 217.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the inadequacy of the fee awarded him by the Referee for services rendered as counsel for the bankrupt. Such inequity as is disclosed by the record, based on a comparison of services rendered by appellant and counsel for the receiver-trustee and their respective fees, does not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion. See Blanch v. Rankin, 5 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 217.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

376 F.2d 196, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-rudolph-n-patterson-ca5-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack