in the Matter of Robert Gist
This text of in the Matter of Robert Gist (in the Matter of Robert Gist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
297 Ga. 142 FINAL COPY
S15Y0228, S15Y0229. IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT GIST (two cases).
PER CURIAM.
These disciplinary matters are before the Court on Notices of Discipline
seeking the disbarment of Robert Gist (State Bar No. 296269). The State Bar
attempted to serve Gist personally at the address listed with the State Bar, which
was a post office box, but Gist did not acknowledge service of the disciplinary
pleadings within 20 days of mailing. The State Bar then properly served Gist
by publication, pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii). Gist failed to file a
Notice of Rejection. Therefore, he is in default, has waived his rights to an
evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as
may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).
The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Gist’s default, show that, with
regard to S15Y0228, Gist administered a trust for a since-deceased client, for
whom he had drafted a will, but failed to communicate with or timely respond
to requests from a co-trustee, ceased providing statements regarding the trust in
December 2007, failed to provide an accounting and other information requested by the co-trustee, and wrote checks on behalf of the trust from an account that
was not an attorney trust account. In an August 2013 letter sent to the
co-trustee’s counsel, Gist denied that he represented the since-deceased client
or the trust and stated that there were no longer funds available from the trust.
Gist was served by publication and mail with a Notice of Investigation, but he
failed to file a timely sworn, written response, as required by Bar Rule 4-204.3.
As of July 1, 2014, Gist is under an administrative suspension for his failure to
pay Bar dues, and this Court suspended Gist on December 9, 2013, for failure
to comply with the rules concerning mandatory legal education.
As to S15Y0229, the facts show that, on June 1, 2013, Gist signed a letter
in proceedings related to his work as a General Securities Representative with
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, consenting to findings related to
certain conduct. Specifically, from 2003 to 2011, Gist misappropriated several
million dollars invested by more than 30 clients. Gist misrepresented that he
would invest the clients’ money in securities, but instead funneled the money
into ENCAP Technologies, LLC, a company he co-founded. Gist perpetuated
the scheme by sending clients wholly fabricated account statements and by
making periodic payments with funds obtained from other investors or from
2 selling units of ENCAP.
Based on these facts, the Investigative Panel found probable cause to
believe that, with regard to S15Y0228, Gist violated Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I),
1.15 (II), 1.16, 8.4 (a) (4), and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct
found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). As to S15Y0229, the Investigative Panel found
probable cause to believe that Gist violated Rules 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 8.4 (a) (4),
and 9.3. The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.15 (I), 1.15
(II), and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, and the maximum sanction for a violation of
Rules 1.4, 1.16, and 9.3 is a public reprimand. In aggravation of discipline, the
Investigative Panel found that Gist had a dishonest or selfish motive; that these
two matters, taken together, suggest a pattern of misconduct; that the
complainants were vulnerable victims; that Gist has experience in the practice
of law, having been admitted in 1980; and that Gist shows indifference to
making restitution.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that disbarment is the
appropriate sanction in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the
name of Robert Gist be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice
law in the State of Georgia. Gist is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule
3 4-219 (c).
Disbarred. All the Justices concur.
Decided May 11, 2015.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Rebecca A. Hall,
Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Matter of Robert Gist, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-robert-gist-ga-2015.