In the Matter of Richard H. Middleton, Jr

316 Ga. 825
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 5, 2023
DocketS23Y0922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 316 Ga. 825 (In the Matter of Richard H. Middleton, Jr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Richard H. Middleton, Jr, 316 Ga. 825 (Ga. 2023).

Opinion

316 Ga. 825 FINAL COPY

S23Y0922. IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD H. MIDDLETON, JR.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for

voluntary surrender of license filed by Richard H. Middleton, Jr.,

(State Bar No. 504912) before the issuance of a formal complaint.

See Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2). In this petition, Middleton admits that in

connection with a single client matter he violated Rules 1.15 (I) (c)

and 1.15 (II) (b) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct

(“GRPC”) found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a

violation of both of these rules is disbarment.

Middleton, who has been a member of the State Bar since 1977,

admits the following facts. Middleton was associated as co-counsel

by an attorney licensed in South Carolina to represent a client who

was injured in an automobile collision in the Savannah, Georgia

area in November 2016. Middleton filed a lawsuit on behalf of the

client in the Chatham County State Court in November 2018. Middleton then settled the lawsuit with the primary insurance

carrier for the policy limit of $100,000 in May 2020. The settlement

funds were placed in Middleton’s IOLTA account at his bank

pending the resolution of the client’s South Carolina workers’

compensation case, in which she was being represented by the South

Carolina attorney. In March 2021, the South Carolina attorney

resolved the workers’ compensation case when the carrier agreed to

a lien waiver and, on that same day, notified Middleton that the

workers’ compensation matter was resolved and that the settlement

proceeds from the collision case could be disbursed. However,

Middleton refused to disburse the settlement funds to the client or

the South Carolina attorney despite numerous requests being made.

Middleton admits that sufficient funds were not available in his

IOLTA account because he incrementally withdrew the settlement

proceeds for his personal use after the settlement proceeds were

deposited into his IOLTA account.

Based on these admissions, Middleton states that he violated

Rule 1.15 (I) (c) by failing to promptly deliver the settlement

2 proceeds to the South Carolina attorney and the client, but asserts

that he has since fully reimbursed both parties. In addition, he

states that he violated Rule 1.15 (II) (b) by failing to withdraw only

earned fees, and, instead, incrementally withdrawing client funds

from his IOLTA account for his personal use over a considerable

period of time without providing an accounting.

Given the admissions of fact and conduct described herein,

Middleton requests the Court accept this petition for voluntary

surrender of his license. See In the Matter of Bunch, 314 Ga. 423,

425 (877 SE2d 274) (2022) (accepting petition for voluntary

surrender of license based on Special Master’s recommendation for

attorney who violated, among other rules, Rules 1.15 (I) (c) and 1.15

(II) (b) by failing to safeguard client’s settlement funds and

administer client funds from a trust account); In the Matter of

Dabney-Froe, 302 Ga. 746, 746-747 (808 SE2d 649) (2017) (accepting

petition for voluntary surrender of license where attorney failed to

promptly disburse funds or provide accounting of funds in violation

of Rule 1.15 (I)). The State Bar has responded to the petition and

3 recommends that the Court accept the petition based on Middleton’s

admissions.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Middleton’s

petition for voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount

to disbarment. See GRPC 1.0 (s). Accordingly, it is ordered that the

name of Richard H. Middleton, Jr., be removed from the rolls of

persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Middleton

is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (b).

Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.

Decided July 5, 2023.

Voluntary surrender of license.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William D.

NeSmith III, Deputy General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K.

Mittelman, Wolanda R. Shelton, Assistant General Counsel State

Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Stephen Dana Morrison, Jr
915 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 Ga. 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-richard-h-middleton-jr-ga-2023.