In the Matter of Richard A. Carlson, Bankrupt. California State Board of Equalization, and v. Richard A. Carlson, And

Ninth Circuit

In the Matter of Richard A. Carlson, Bankrupt. California State Board of Equalization, and v. Richard A. Carlson, And

423 F.2d 714, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10799

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 1970

Docket23580_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 423 F.2d 714 (In the Matter of Richard A. Carlson, Bankrupt. California State Board of Equalization, and v. Richard A. Carlson, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Richard A. Carlson, Bankrupt. California State Board of Equalization, and v. Richard A. Carlson, And, 423 F.2d 714, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10799 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The only substantial question presented is whether the proviso in section 17a (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § *715 35(a), preserves a pre-bankruptcy tax lien as to assets acquired after bankruptcy. The three district courts which have considered this question have answered it in the negative. In re Carlson, 292 F.Supp. 778 (C.D.Calif.1968); In re Braund, 289 F.Supp. 604 (C.D.Calif.1968); United States v. Sanabria (N.D.Ill., June 21, 1968) (Unreported) (Appeal pending in the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 17,145). See also Marsh, Triumph or Tragedy? The Bankruptcy Amendments of 1966, 42 Wash.L.Rev. 681 (1967); Note, 14 Vill.L.Rev. 323, 326 (1969).

There are substantial arguments on both sides, but we have concluded that on balance the result reached in these decisions is the better one.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The only substantial question presented is whether the proviso in section 17a (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § *715 35(a), preserves a pre-bankruptcy tax lien as to assets acquired after bankruptcy. The three district courts which have considered this question have answered it in the negative. In re Carlson, 292 F.Supp. 778 (C.D.Calif.1968); In re Braund, 289 F.Supp. 604 (C.D.Calif.1968); United States v. Sanabria (N.D.Ill., June 21, 1968) (Unreported) (Appeal pending in the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 17,145). See also Marsh, Triumph or Tragedy? The Bankruptcy Amendments of 1966, 42 Wash.L.Rev. 681 (1967); Note, 14 Vill.L.Rev. 323, 326 (1969).

There are substantial arguments on both sides, but we have concluded that on balance the result reached in these decisions is the better one.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 F.2d 714, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-richard-a-carlson-bankrupt-california-state-board-of-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack