In the Matter of Reback

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In the Matter of Reback

492 A.2d 267

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1985·No. 83-1289·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petitions of respondents for rehearing and rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied, and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the opinions of January 31, 1985, 487 A.2d 235, are vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the Court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before April 29, 1985.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petitions of respondents for rehearing and rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied, and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the opinions of January 31, 1985, 487 A.2d 235, are vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the Court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before April 29, 1985.

In the Matter of Reback, 492 A.2d 267 (D.C. 1985).

Pincite

492 A.2d 267 (In the Matter of Reback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related