In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci
This text of In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci (In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court No. 2026-37-M.P.
In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci. :
ORDER On January 23, 2026, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13 of the Supreme Court
Rules of Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys, the respondent, Raymond T.
Trebisacci, filed an affidavit with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court
setting forth that he is aware that he is the subject of an investigation into
professional misconduct. The respondent’s affidavit sets forth that he freely and
voluntarily consents to disbarment, and that he is fully aware of the implications of
submitting his consent. On February 4, 2026, Disciplinary Counsel filed the
respondent’s affidavit with the Court.
Upon review of respondent’s affidavit, we deem that an order disbarring
respondent is appropriate.
Accordingly, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13, it is hereby ordered, adjudged,
and decreed that the respondent, Raymond T. Trebisacci, be and is hereby disbarred
on consent from engaging in the practice of law.
It is further ordered that Stephen M. Reck, Esq., of the law firm of Stephen
M. Reck and Scott D. Camassar LLC located in North Stonington, CT, is hereby
-1- appointed as Special Master to take possession of and inventory respondent’s client
files and take whatever steps necessary to protect the clients’ interests; including, but
not limited to, returning files to the clients or new counsel of each client’s choice.
The Special Master and/or his designated agents of the law firm are hereby
authorized to have full access to respondent’s client files and office in order to
effectuate this Order.
It is further ordered that Chief Disciplinary Counsel Kerry Reilley Travers is
hereby appointed Special Master over respondent’s accounts. The Special Master
over accounts and/or her designated agents are given sole and exclusive access to
the following accounts heretofore controlled by respondent, either solely or jointly:
business and operating accounts; trust accounts, including special trust accounts;
clients’ accounts; estate accounts; and any and all other accounts related to
respondent’s law practice that he uses presently or has in the past utilized for the
deposit and maintenance of fiduciary and/or clients’ funds and fee advances. The
foregoing list of accounts shall also include any accounts where respondent serves
as an agent, special agent, trustee, personal representative, executor, power of
attorney, or custodian. The Special Master over accounts shall have sole control over
these above-described accounts, to the exclusion of respondent. By this Order, the
Court prohibits respondent or any of his agents from withdrawing or transferring
funds from the aforementioned accounts.
-2- The Court also hereby orders respondent to fully cooperate with the Special
Masters to assist them and their agents in effectuating their duties and directs that
any lack of cooperation on respondent’s behalf be reported to this Court for further
action.
The respondent is directed to comply with the mandates of Article III, Rule
15 of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys, and within
ten days after the effective date of the disbarment order, the respondent shall file
with the Clerk of this Court an affidavit showing:
(1) That he has fully complied with the provisions of this Order and with the
requirements of Article III, Rule 15;
(2) A list of other state, federal, and administrative jurisdictions to which he
is admitted to practice law; and
(3) That he has served a copy of the affidavit upon Disciplinary Counsel. The
affidavit shall also set forth the residence or other address where
communications may thereafter be directed to the respondent.
-3- Entered as an Order of this Court this 19th day of February 2026.
By Order,
/s/ Meredith A. Benoit Clerk
Chief Justice Suttell did not participate.
-4- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT – CLERK’S OFFICE Licht Judicial Complex 250 Benefit Street Providence, RI 02903
ORDER COVER SHEET
Title of Case In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci.
Case Number No. 2026-37-M.P.
Date Order Filed February 19, 2026
Justices Goldberg, Robinson, Lynch Prata, and Long, JJ.
Source of Appeal N/A
Judicial Officer from Lower Court N/A
For Petitioner:
Kerry Travers, Esq. Maria R. Lenz, Esq. Attorney(s) on Appeal Office of Disciplinary Counsel For Respondent:
Stephen M. Reck, Esq.
SU-CMS-02B (revised November 2022)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-raymond-t-trebisacci-ri-2026.