In the Matter of Preston
256 P.3d 160, 242 Or. App. 571
This text of 256 P.3d 160 (In the Matter of Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In the Matter of Preston, 256 P.3d 160, 242 Or. App. 571 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Compensation of Terri L. Preston, Claimant.
SAIF CORPORATION; and DCI Holdings, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Terri L. PRESTON, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.
Matthew L. Roy and Dunn & Roy filed the brief for respondent.
Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded. SAIF v. DeLeon, 241 Or.App. 614, 251 P.3d 794 (2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon
251 P.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
SAIF Corp. v. Preston
256 P.3d 160 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
256 P.3d 160, 242 Or. App. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-preston-orctapp-2011.