in the Matter of Peggy Ruth Goodnight

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 2014
DocketS14Y0094
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of Peggy Ruth Goodnight (in the Matter of Peggy Ruth Goodnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of Peggy Ruth Goodnight, (Ga. 2014).

Opinion

295 Ga. 214 FINAL COPY

S14Y0094. IN THE MATTER OF PEGGY RUTH GOODNIGHT.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of Discipline

seeking a public reprimand for Peggy Ruth Goodnight (State Bar No. 301445).

The State Bar attempted to serve Goodnight personally at the address listed with

it, but the sheriff filed a return of service non est inventus. The State Bar then

properly served Goodnight by publication pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3)

(ii). As Goodnight failed to file a Notice of Rejection, she is in default, has

waived her rights to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and

further proceedings as may be determined by this Court, see Bar Rule 4-208.1

(b).

The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Goodnight’s default, show that

one of her clients filed a grievance with the State Bar. Goodnight did not

respond to any of the inquiries by the Office of the General Counsel (“OGC”)

during its investigation of the grievance, so the OGC issued a Notice of

Investigation. Goodnight was personally served with the notice but failed to respond. This Court placed Goodnight on interim suspension in January 2012

due to her failure to respond to the Notice of Investigation. The Investigative

Panel determined that, by her failure to respond, Goodnight violated Rule 9.3

of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The

State Bar recommends that for her violation of Rule 9.3, Goodnight receive a

public reprimand. However, based on our review of the record, which includes

the fact that Goodnight has no history of prior discipline, we conclude that a

Review Panel reprimand is the appropriate sanction in this matter.

Accordingly, we hereby order that Goodnight receive a Review Panel

reprimand in accordance with Bar Rules 4-102 (b) (4) and 4-220 (b) for her

admitted violation of Rule 9.3.

Review Panel reprimand. All the Justices concur.

Decided May 19, 2014.

Review Panel reprimand.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Rebecca A. Hall, Assistant

General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Goodnight
758 S.E.2d 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of Peggy Ruth Goodnight, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-peggy-ruth-goodnight-ga-2014.