In the Matter of Ok
This text of 166 P.3d 574 (In the Matter of Ok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of O.K., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
O.K., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
*575 Caryanne Conner filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SERCOMBE, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of her mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A) (defining "mentally ill person" as a person who, because of a mental disorder, is "[d]angerous to self or others"). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 P.3d 574, 214 Or. App. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ok-orctapp-2007.