In the Matter of Nm
This text of 222 P.3d 48 (In the Matter of Nm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of N.M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
N.M., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Kent A. Anderson, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Pamela J. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that, among other things, the evidence was insufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the hearing, he suffered from a mental disorder that caused him to be a danger to himself or to others. ORS 426.130(1). The state concedes that the evidence is not sufficient. On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. *49 59, 61, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 P.3d 48, 232 Or. App. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-nm-orctapp-2009.