In the Matter of Nichols

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of Nichols

939 A.2d 223, 193 N.J. 345, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 19

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-164, concluding that JAMES D. NICHOLS of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be reprimanded for violating. RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES D. NICHOLS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-164, concluding that JAMES D. NICHOLS of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be reprimanded for violating. RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES D. NICHOLS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In the Matter of Nichols, 939 A.2d 223, 193 N.J. 345, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 19 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

939 A.2d 223 (In the Matter of Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related