In the Matter of Neil Richard Flit
This text of 846 S.E.2d 403 (In the Matter of Neil Richard Flit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
309 Ga. 440 FINAL COPY
S20Y0637. IN THE MATTER OF NEIL RICHARD FLIT.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the
special master, who recommends that the Court accept the petition
for voluntary surrender of license filed by Neil Richard Flit (State
Bar No. 091307) after the filing of a formal complaint, pursuant to
Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In his petition, Flit requested that he be allowed
to voluntarily surrender his license for his admitted violations, in
two separate matters, of Rule 1.15 (I) of the Georgia Rules of
Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and the State Bar has
requested that Flit’s petition be granted. For the reasons that follow,
we accept the petition.
In her report and recommendation, the special master found
that, with regard to State Disciplinary Board (“SDB”) Docket No.
7215, Flit, who has been a member of the Bar since 2007, was
retained to represent a client in a personal injury claim. Flit settled the case and deposited the funds in his trust account on or about
August 2013. The client died in January 2014, but Flit did not
promptly give the administrator of the client’s estate an accounting
of the settlement proceeds or deliver to the administrator any of the
funds the estate was entitled to receive until February 2018. With
regard to SDB Docket No. 7231, the special master found that Flit
was retained to represent a separate client in a different personal
injury claim. Flit settled the case and deposited the funds in his
trust account on or about June 2016, but he did not promptly give
his client an accounting of the settlement proceeds and did not
deliver to his client the funds she was entitled to receive until
January 2019. The special master agreed with Flit that his conduct
in both cases violated Bar Rule 1.15 (I), the maximum penalty for
which is disbarment.
Noting that a surrender of license is tantamount to
disbarment, see Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.0 (r), the
special master recommended that the Court accept Flit’s petition.
See In the Matter of Dabney-Froe, 302 Ga. 746 (808 SE2d 649) (2017) (accepting voluntary surrender of license where attorney failed to
disburse funds or provide accounting of funds); In the Matter of
Slade, 286 Ga. 465 (689 SE2d 315) (2010) (accepting voluntary
surrender of license where attorney admitted that he failed to
deliver funds to client or account for them).
We have reviewed the records and agree to accept Flit’s
petition for voluntary surrender of his license. Accordingly, it is
ordered that the name of Neil Richard Flit be removed from the rolls
of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Flit is
reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (b).
Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.
DECIDED JULY 15, 2020. Voluntary surrender of license. Warren R. Hinds, for Flit. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, William D. NeSmith III, Deputy General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, William V. Hearnburg, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
846 S.E.2d 403, 309 Ga. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-neil-richard-flit-ga-2020.