In the Matter of Nealy

14 A.3d 1288, 205 N.J. 264, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 352
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 30, 2011·No. D-32 September Term 2010, 067184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-224, concluding that WALTER D. NEALY of ENGLEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on an attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And WALTER D. NEALY having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WALTER D. NEALY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*265 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Nealy, 14 A.3d 1288, 205 N.J. 264, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 352 (N.J. 2011).

14 A.3d 1288 (In the Matter of Nealy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Miskowski
14 A.3d 1288 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)