In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander

Ninth Circuit

In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander

521 F.2d 794

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 8, 1975

Docket75-1402

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 521 F.2d 794 (In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander, 521 F.2d 794 (9th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

After a hearing Monte J. Morris, counsel of record for appellant, is assessed a penalty of three hundred dollars, under Rule 46(c), F.R.A.P., for failure to prosecute this criminal appeal with due diligence.

Payment is to be made to the Clerk of this Court within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order. The payment, in due course, will be transmitted to the Treasurer of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

After a hearing Monte J. Morris, counsel of record for appellant, is assessed a penalty of three hundred dollars, under Rule 46(c), F.R.A.P., for failure to prosecute this criminal appeal with due diligence.

Payment is to be made to the Clerk of this Court within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order. The payment, in due course, will be transmitted to the Treasurer of the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 F.2d 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-monte-j-morris-esq-united-states-of-america-v-david-ca9-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack