In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir
This text of In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir (In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In the Matter of : No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : : No. 125 DB 2004 MOHAMED ALAMGIR : : Attorney Registration No. 65321 : PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Out of State)
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the parties’ responses
to the Court’s rule to show cause dated January 11, 2019, the rule is made absolute, and
the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses
incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for
Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-mohamed-alamgir-pa-2019.