In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 2019·No. 966 DD3·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : : No. 125 DB 2004

MOHAMED ALAMGIR :

: Attorney Registration No. 65321 :

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the parties’ responses

to the Court’s rule to show cause dated January 11, 2019, the rule is made absolute, and

the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for

Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir, (Pa. 2019).

In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir (In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.