In the Matter of Minor Huntington

6 N.C. 369
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 N.C. 369 (In the Matter of Minor Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Minor Huntington, 6 N.C. 369 (N.C. 1818).

Opinion

SeáweíIí Judge.

When a Defendant in execution within the prison rules, is afterwards thrown into prison by another creditor, the Defendant then has a right to be discharged from the walls of the prison under the insolvent laws. And when discharged, it is for him to determine whether his bond has become vacated by such discharge : he then is at liberty to act in the same way as he was before his imprisonment. The Court cannot in such case restrain him from breaking the bounds, nor will it advise him of the effect which breaking the bounds will have in subjecting his securities. It is not competent for the Court to pass any jüdicial determination upon the rights of creditors, who are not before it, in a shape where the validity of the bond can come in question.

In this opinion, Hall, Daniel, and Ruffin, Judges, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. . Ponder
29 N.C. 390 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.C. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-minor-huntington-nc-1818.