In the Matter of Minniola O. Miller, Debtor-Appellant
This text of 198 F.2d 267 (In the Matter of Minniola O. Miller, Debtor-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
198 F.2d 267
In the Matter of Minniola O. MILLER, Debtor-Appellant.
No. 264, Docket 22305.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 4, 1952.
Decided June 19, 1952.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
Minniola O. Miller, pro se.
Ufa E. Guthrie, pro se.
Hugh Meade Alcorn, Jr., Henry P. Bakewell, Hartford, Conn., of counsel, for appellee Town of Suffield.
Elihu H. Berman, Hartford, Conn., for appellee Malvy Realty Co.
PER CURIAM.
Judge Smith has discussed all the pertinent questions raised by the appellant, 106 F.Supp. 40. He decided that she had proposed no practicable plan of rehabilitation, that her charges of bad faith and fraud were groundless, and dismissed her final petition under the Frazier-lemke Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, and certain counterclaims under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. We concur in his action and are convinced that it is past the time when this appellant should be allowed by any means to further prevent her creditors from proceeding in the State Courts to liquidate thier claims.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 F.2d 267, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-minniola-o-miller-debtor-appellan-ca2-1952.