In The Matter Of Meyerland Company

921 F.2d 55, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22496
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1990
Docket89-6118
StatusPublished

This text of 921 F.2d 55 (In The Matter Of Meyerland Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In The Matter Of Meyerland Company, 921 F.2d 55, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22496 (5th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

921 F.2d 55

In the Matter of MEYERLAND COMPANY and William M. Adkinson, Debtors.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Manager of the
FSLIC Resolution Fund as Receiver for Continental
Savings Association, Appellant,
v.
MEYERLAND COMPANY and William Adkinson, Appellees.

No. 89-6118.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 27, 1990.

Bruce R. Coulombe, Lee R. Larkin, Andrews & Kurth, Houston, Tex., Richard J. Osterman, Jr., Atty. F.D.I.C., Washington, D.C., for F.D.I.C.

Michael L. O'Brien, Houston, Tex., for Meyerland Co.

Daniel Kistler, Robert L. Collins, Houston, Tex., for Adkinson.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 7, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 910 F.2d 1257)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. A majority of the panel enjoined further proceedings in this cause in the state courts of Texas. Because it is necessary in aid of our jurisdiction, we continue that injunction pending the completion of en banc review. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2283. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Judge Jones is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyerland Co.
921 F.2d 55 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
921 F.2d 55, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-meyerland-company-ca5-1990.