In the Matter of Marriage of Litowitz

53 P.3d 516
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2002
Docket70413-9
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 53 P.3d 516 (In the Matter of Marriage of Litowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Marriage of Litowitz, 53 P.3d 516 (Wash. 2002).

Opinion

53 P.3d 516 (2002)

In the Matter OF the MARRIAGE OF David J. LITOWITZ, Respondent, and
Becky M. Litowitz, Petitioner.

No. 70413-9.

Supreme Court of Washington.

September 10, 2002.

ORDER

CHANGING OPINION

It is hereby ordered that the concurring opinion of Justice Chambers in the above cause, as the same appears at 146 Wash.2d 514, 534, 48 P.3d 261, be changed as follows:

1. In the eighth and seventh lines from the bottom of page 534, [18th and 19th line from top of column two of page 271 of 48 P.3d] the text "CHAMBERS, J. (concurring)—I concur with the result reached by the majority." is deleted and the following text is inserted in its place:

CHAMBERS, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I largely concur with the reasoning of the majority. However, I would remand for further proceedings based on contract principles, equity, and public policy.

2. In the seventh line from the bottom of page 534, [19th line from top of column two of page 271 of 48 P.3d], the sentence beginning with the words "The majority grounds" begins a new paragraph.

3. The following sentence is inserted at the end of the opinion in the 10th line from the top of page 535 [7th line from bottom of column two of p. 271, of 48 P.3d]: "However, given that the trial court applied a different standard, remand is the appropriate remedy."

4. In 11th line from the top of page 535, [6th line from bottom of column two of page 271 of 48 P.3d] the sentence "IRELAND, J., concurs with CHAMBERS, J." is deleted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison
322 P.3d 1 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)
Szafranski v. Dunston
2013 IL App (1st) 122975 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2013)
State v. Lathrop
104 P.3d 737 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
State v. Oliva
117 Wash. App. 773 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 P.3d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-marriage-of-litowitz-wash-2002.