in the Matter of M.A.G.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 3, 2010
Docket04-09-00594-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of M.A.G. (in the Matter of M.A.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of M.A.G., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00594-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.A.G.

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-JUV-01723 Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 3, 2010

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On October 29, 2009, the court reporter responsible for this cause filed a notification of

late record stating that the reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay

or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not

entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

Therefore, on November 9, 2009 we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this

court that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the

reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We warned

appellant that upon failure to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due

within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and we would only consider those issues or 04-09-00594-CV

points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Because we received no response, Appellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on

December 9, 2009. No brief was filed. On December 23, 2009, we ordered that appellant show

cause in writing within fifteen days why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). We received no response. The appeal is, therefore,

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of M.A.G., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-mag-texapp-2010.