In the Matter of Maf
This text of 180 P.3d 66 (In the Matter of Maf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of M.A.F., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
M.A.F., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Liza Langford, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. *67 ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant's mental illness causes her to be unable to provide for her basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state's concession to be well-founded and accept it.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 P.3d 66, 218 Or. App. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-maf-orctapp-2008.