in the Matter of M. D. J. W.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 2005
Docket14-04-00843-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Matter of M. D. J. W. (in the Matter of M. D. J. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Matter of M. D. J. W., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00843-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.D.J.W.

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03‑04334J

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

M.D.J.W., a juvenile, was found to have engaged in delinquent conduct and was placed on probation.  Subsequently, he stipulated that he violated a term of his probation, and, on June 29, 2004, the trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Texas Youth Commission.  This appeal followed.  

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).


A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant and appellant=s mother.  Appellant and his mother were advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Matter of M. D. J. W., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-m-d-j-w-texapp-2005.