In the Matter of Lowell Louis Lehner, Bankrupt No. 67-B-3931. Household Finance Corporation v. Dolores B. Kopel, Trustee in Bankruptcy

427 F.2d 357
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 1970
Docket619-69
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 427 F.2d 357 (In the Matter of Lowell Louis Lehner, Bankrupt No. 67-B-3931. Household Finance Corporation v. Dolores B. Kopel, Trustee in Bankruptcy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Lowell Louis Lehner, Bankrupt No. 67-B-3931. Household Finance Corporation v. Dolores B. Kopel, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 427 F.2d 357 (10th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Household Finance Corporation made a loan to the bankrupt secured by a tape-deck and speaker and by a television set. Colorado has adopted the Uniform Commercial Code. Thereunder, a financing statement must be filed to perfect security transactions of the type with which we are concerned. C.R.S. 1963, § 155-9-302(1). Such statement is sufficient if if “contains a statement indicating the types, or describing the items, of collateral.” Supra, § 155-9-402(1). The filed financing statement described the collateral as “consumer goods.” After bankruptcy of the debtor, Household Finance filed a petition for leave to foreclose. The Trustee asserted that the lien was invalid. The Referee held that the security interest was void because the financing statement did not sufficiently describe the types or items of collateral. On petition to review, the district court sustained the Referee.

There are no Colorado decisions in point. In such circumstances we accept the district court’s interpretation of its state law unless we are convinced that it is clearly wrong. In re Cummings, 10 Cir., 413 F.2d 1281, 1285, cert. denied sub nom. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Horton, 397 U.S. 915, 90 S.Ct. 918, 25 L.Ed.2d 95. The comprehensive briefs of Household Finance do not convince us that the district court was clearly wrong. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed on the basis of the decision of the trial court reported as In re Lehner, D.C.Colo., 303 F.Supp. 317.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interbusiness Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Mifflin.
318 F. Supp. 2d 230 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Lloyds Credit Corp. v. McClain Heller Ins., Inc.
620 A.2d 472 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
In Re Boykins
120 B.R. 71 (N.D. Mississippi, 1990)
Tomchin Furniture Co. v. Lester
309 S.E.2d 73 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1983)
Flanigan v. United States (In Re Wiskur)
31 B.R. 39 (W.D. Missouri, 1983)
Thorp Commercial Corp. v. Northgate Industries, Inc.
654 F.2d 1245 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Davis v. Kisko (In Re McKeon)
7 B.R. 10 (N.D. Florida, 1980)
Material Service Corp. v. Bogdajewicz
387 N.E.2d 1057 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)
Mogul Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc.
585 P.2d 1096 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1978)
First National Bank v. Barr
443 F. Supp. 738 (D. Kansas, 1977)
In Re Werth
443 F. Supp. 738 (D. Kansas, 1977)
Public Finance Corp. of Alabama v. Turnage
493 F.2d 505 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Maryland National Bank v. Porter-Way Harvester Manufacturing Co.
300 A.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1972)
James Talcott, Inc. v. Franklin Nat. Bank of Mpls.
194 N.W.2d 775 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F.2d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-lowell-louis-lehner-bankrupt-no-67-b-3931-household-ca10-1970.