In the Matter of Leopold Frankel, Charged With Criminal Contempt. Leopold Frankel

Third Circuit

In the Matter of Leopold Frankel, Charged With Criminal Contempt. Leopold Frankel

362 F.2d 1013, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5419

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1966

Docket15484

StatusPublished

This text of 362 F.2d 1013 (In the Matter of Leopold Frankel, Charged With Criminal Contempt. Leopold Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Leopold Frankel, Charged With Criminal Contempt. Leopold Frankel, 362 F.2d 1013, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5419 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a contempt proceeding initiated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, under N.J.S.A. 2A:10-1. The appellant, relying on § 1443 of Title 28 U.S.C.A., removed the proceeding to the court below. The present appeal is from an order of remand entered on the motion of the Specially Assigned Prosecutor. After due consideration of the matter we find that the allegations of the petition failed to meet the requirements of either subdivision (1) or (2) of § 1443, supra. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (June 20, 1966); Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (June 20, 1966). _

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a contempt proceeding initiated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, under N.J.S.A. 2A:10-1. The appellant, relying on § 1443 of Title 28 U.S.C.A., removed the proceeding to the court below. The present appeal is from an order of remand entered on the motion of the Specially Assigned Prosecutor. After due consideration of the matter we find that the allegations of the petition failed to meet the requirements of either subdivision (1) or (2) of § 1443, supra. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (June 20, 1966); Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (June 20, 1966). _

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 F.2d 1013, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-leopold-frankel-charged-with-criminal-contempt-leopold-ca3-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack