In the Matter of Leonelli-Spina

957 A.2d 211, 196 N.J. 455
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 25, 2008
DocketD-162 September Term 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 957 A.2d 211 (In the Matter of Leonelli-Spina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Leonelli-Spina, 957 A.2d 211, 196 N.J. 455 (N.J. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-309, recommending that VINCENZA LEONELLI-SPINA of TOTOWA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, be disbarred for the knowing misappropriation of client trust funds, in violation of RPC 1.15(c) (failure to safeguard client funds) and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979), and In re Hollendonner, 102 N.J. 21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985);

And VINCENZA LEONELLI-SPINA having been ordered to show cause why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that VINCENZA LEONELLI-SPINA be disbarred, effective immediately, and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by VINCENZA LEONELLI-SPINA pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that VINCENZA LEONELLI-SPINA be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

*456 ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albro v. Leonelli-Spina (In Re Leonell-Spina)
426 F. App'x 122 (Third Circuit, 2011)
In Re Giles
957 A.2d 211 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
957 A.2d 211, 196 N.J. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-leonelli-spina-nj-2008.