in the Matter of Latoya Ellison

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 2013·No. 05-12-00955-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 12, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00955-CV

IN THE MATTER OF LATOYA NICHOLE ELLISON AND PINETO WOODARD

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV12-00279-V-292

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Despite being given notice more than ten days ago that his brief was late and his appeal

would be dismissed unless his brief was filed, appellant Pineto Woodard has not filed his brief or

otherwise communicated with the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal. See id. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE

120955F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE MATTER OF LATOYA On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District NICHOLE ELLISON AND PINETO Court, Dallas County, Texas WOODARD Trial Court Cause No. CV12-00279-V-292. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. No. 05-12-00955-CV Justices Myers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Latoya Nichole Ellison recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Pineto Woodard.

Judgment entered this 12th day of December, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O’NEILL JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Matter of Latoya Ellison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in the Matter of Latoya Ellison (in the Matter of Latoya Ellison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.