In the Matter of Larry Edward Hendricks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided April 13, 2016·No. 2016-UP-173·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000205

Appeal From Fairfield County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-173 Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed April 13, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Laura Ruth Baer, of Columbia; and Larry Edward Hendricks, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Kershaw, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Larry Edward Hendricks, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

In the Matter of Larry Edward Hendricks (In the Matter of Larry Edward Hendricks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy
602 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)