In the Matter of Lafferty
This text of 185 N.W.2d 189 (In the Matter of Lafferty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE MATTER OF LAFFERTY
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Henrietta E. Rosenthal, for the judge of Recorder's Court of Detroit.
Lafferty, Reosti, Jabara, Papakhian, James, Strickgold & Smith and Goodman, Eden, Robb, Millender, Goodman & Bedrosian (Gage, Burgess & Knox, of counsel), for defendants on appeal.
Amicus curiae: Metropolitan Detroit Branch, American Civil Liberties Union, by James K. Robinson.
*655 Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and LEVIN and PETERSON,[*] JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The exercise by a trial judge of his summary power to punish for contempt of court committed in his presence is subject to review on appeal. See In re Scott (1955), 342 Mich 614, 616; In re Burns (1969), 19 Mich App 525; People v. Ravitz (1970), 26 Mich App 263. It would not serve a constructive purpose to attempt to summarize the record. Suffice it to say that we have read and reread the transcript of the proceedings and have concluded that the convictions and sentences should be and hereby are set aside and reversed.
NOTES
[*] Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 N.W.2d 189, 28 Mich. App. 654, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-lafferty-michctapp-1970.