In the Matter of King

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In the Matter of King

964 A.2d 298, 197 N.J. 499, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 82

DecidedFebruary 11, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 964 A.2d 298 (In the Matter of King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of King, 964 A.2d 298, 197 N.J. 499, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 82 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-225, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), EDWARD J. KING of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.1(a) (false statement of material fact on bar admission application), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (con *500 duct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. KING is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-225, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), EDWARD J. KING of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.1(a) (false statement of material fact on bar admission application), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (con *500 duct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. KING is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

964 A.2d 298, 197 N.J. 499, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-king-nj-2009.