In the Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J.

New York Court of Appeals

In the Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J.

868 N.E.2d 222, 8 N.Y.3d 968, 836 N.Y.S.2d 540, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 958

DecidedMay 3, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 868 N.E.2d 222 (In the Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J., 868 N.E.2d 222, 8 N.Y.3d 968, 836 N.Y.S.2d 540, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 958 (N.Y. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the dispositional orders entered upon default, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from an Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from an order entered upon default (see CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s denial of the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

*969 Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the dispositional orders entered upon default, dismissed upon the ground that no appeal lies from an Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from an order entered upon default (see CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s denial of the motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

*969 Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 N.E.2d 222, 8 N.Y.3d 968, 836 N.Y.S.2d 540, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-kimberly-carolyn-j-ny-2007.