In the Matter of Kevin Nixon
This text of In the Matter of Kevin Nixon (In the Matter of Kevin Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Kevin Nixon, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000235
Appeal From Horry County Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-295 Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed June 17, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of Law Office of Charles T. Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2
APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1 See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Matter of Kevin Nixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-kevin-nixon-scctapp-2015.