In the Matter of Karl L. Gretz, and Gabrielle W. Gretz, His Wife, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. P & C Realty Co., Formerly Known as Esslinger's Inc.

361 F.2d 450
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 1966
Docket15756_1
StatusPublished

This text of 361 F.2d 450 (In the Matter of Karl L. Gretz, and Gabrielle W. Gretz, His Wife, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. P & C Realty Co., Formerly Known as Esslinger's Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Karl L. Gretz, and Gabrielle W. Gretz, His Wife, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. P & C Realty Co., Formerly Known as Esslinger's Inc., 361 F.2d 450 (3d Cir. 1966).

Opinion

361 F.2d 450

In the Matter of Karl L. GRETZ, and Gabrielle W. Gretz, His Wife, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts.
P & C Realty Co., Formerly Known as Esslinger's Inc., Appellants.

No. 15756.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 25, 1966.

Decided June 8, 1966.

Abraham L. Shapiro, Philadelphia, Pa. (Norman C. Henss, Cohen, Shapiro, Berger & Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Lester J. Schaffer, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herman N. Silver, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In a bankruptcy proceeding the appellant has sought to make what is in essence a collateral attack upon a money judgment which the bankrupt recovered against it in a state court. The appellant's contention is that the state judgment resulted from perjured testimony. However, this issue was raised in the state trial court before judgment and again urged on appeal in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The state courts were not persuaded to withhold or vacate judgment. We agree with the district court that the same grounds which were urged unsuccessfully in the state court cannot be the basis of relief from the consequences of that judgment in the bankruptcy court.

The Order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Gretz
361 F.2d 450 (Third Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 F.2d 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-karl-l-gretz-and-gabrielle-w-gretz-his-wife-ca3-1966.