In the Matter of K. N. S. v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
DecidedApril 3, 2026
Docket03-26-00132-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Matter of K. N. S. v. the State of Texas (In the Matter of K. N. S. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of K. N. S. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00132-CV

In the Matter of K. N. S., Appellant

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 5082, THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 10, 2026, this Court notified K.N.S. that her notice of appeal filed

February 6, 2026, appeared untimely and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction unless she filed a response explaining how this Court has jurisdiction over this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) (allowing appellate court to dismiss case for want of

jurisdiction after giving ten days’ notice to parties). K.N.S. filed a response acknowledging that

her appeal is untimely and moving for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

K.N.S. seeks to appeal from a judgment entered on July 17, 2024. The record

does not reflect any post-trial motions. Her notice of appeal was therefore due August 16, 2024.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 30 days after the judgment

is signed). The deadline for filing a notice of appeal may be extended if a motion for extension

of time is filed “within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal.” Tex. R. App.

P. 26.3. However, “once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule

41(a)(2) [now Rule 26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because both the notice of

appeal and motion for extension were not timely filed, we must deny the motion and dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: April 3, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Matter of K. N. S. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-k-n-s-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.