In the Matter of Johnson
This text of 331 S.E.2d 756 (In the Matter of Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By his sole assignment of error, respondent contends that the trial court erred in that it failed to affirmatively state that the allegation of the juvenile petition had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. He argues that the trial judge’s failure to state the standard of proof used in making the determination of delinquency constitutes reversible error. We agree.
G.S. 7A-637 states in relevant part that, “If the judge finds that the allegations in the petition have been proved as provided in G.S. § 7A-635 [beyond a reasonable doubt], he shall so state.” The failure of the trial judge to follow the clear mandate of the statute is error. In re Wade, 67 N.C. App. 708, 313 S.E. 2d 862 (1984).
The decision of the trial court is
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 S.E.2d 756, 76 N.C. App. 159, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-johnson-ncctapp-1985.