In the Matter of Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Matter of Johnson

275 S.W.3d 384, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 2009 WL 215368

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 2009

DocketED 91309

StatusPublished

This text of 275 S.W.3d 384 (In the Matter of Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Johnson, 275 S.W.3d 384, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 2009 WL 215368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christina Peterson appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment and Decree of Grandparents’ Visitation (Judgment) awarding Ada and Charlie Peterson visitation of their granddaughter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Catron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christina Peterson appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment and Decree of Grandparents’ Visitation (Judgment) awarding Ada and Charlie Peterson visitation of their granddaughter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Catron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 S.W.3d 384, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 2009 WL 215368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-johnson-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack