In the Matter of Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Matter of Johnson

275 S.W.3d 384, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 2009 WL 215368

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. ED 91309·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christina Peterson appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment and Decree of Grandparents’ Visitation (Judgment) awarding Ada and Charlie Peterson visitation of their granddaughter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Catron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christina Peterson appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment and Decree of Grandparents’ Visitation (Judgment) awarding Ada and Charlie Peterson visitation of their granddaughter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Catron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

In the Matter of Johnson, 275 S.W.3d 384, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 2009 WL 215368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

275 S.W.3d 384 (In the Matter of Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related